TRANSCOHOT
Investo's verdict, shared with you
No fair value published
The derivation ran and was refused by our own plausibility checks. We publish no number rather than a plausible-looking one.
Why · 2 checks
The derivation failed our plausibility check
The computed value landed outside the 0.4×–2.5× band that real price targets occupy. A result that far from the traded price means one of our inputs is wrong, not that the market is wrong by that much — so we publish nothing rather than clamp it into range.
Implied book multiple is far from the peer group
At the computed value this company would trade at a P/B a long way from its sector median. Either the book-value input or the peer anchor is unreliable.
What we would need
- A per-share input (earnings or book value) that reconciles to the latest audited totals.
- A verified book value per share, or a peer group with enough clean constituents.
Show what the engine computed
Rejected figure · ₦49.36 — floor — raw base ₦49.36 is 0.17x price. This figure is shown only to document what was refused; it is not an estimate and no upside is computed from it.
Method spread · 1.14× between the highest and lowest valuation leg.
Failed plausibility rail · Fair value hit our plausibility bounds: floor — raw base ₦49.36 is 0.17x price. The published base is the rail, not a derivation.
Implied P/B off peers · Implied P/B at base 5.19x is 2.53x the sector median 2.05x.
Source: NGX live market data · Investo intelligence. Educational only — not financial advice.