NNFM
Investo's verdict, shared with you
No fair value published
The derivation ran and was refused by our own plausibility checks. We publish no number rather than a plausible-looking one.
Why · 3 checks
Our valuation methods disagree
The earnings-based and book-based readings of this company differ by more than 2.5×. That spread is real information, but averaging it would manufacture a number no method actually produced.
Implied earnings multiple is far from the peer group
At the computed value this company would trade at a P/E a long way from its sector median. Either the earnings input or the peer anchor is unreliable.
Implied book multiple is far from the peer group
At the computed value this company would trade at a P/B a long way from its sector median. Either the book-value input or the peer anchor is unreliable.
What we would need
- Earnings and book value drawn from the same set of accounts, so the two legs can be reconciled.
- A verified earnings figure, or a peer group with enough clean constituents to anchor against.
- A verified book value per share, or a peer group with enough clean constituents.
Show what the engine computed
Method spread · 124.15× between the highest and lowest valuation leg.
Methods disagree · The valuation legs disagree by 124.15x (Blended P/E band ₦2.17 vs Blended P/B band ₦269.4). No point estimate is defensible until the inputs are reconciled.
Implied P/E off peers · Implied P/E at base 588.14x is 33.78x the sector median 17.41x.
Implied P/B off peers · Implied P/B at base 1.31x is 0.24x the sector median 5.41x.
Source: NGX live market data · Investo intelligence. Educational only — not financial advice.