CILEASING
Investo's verdict, shared with you
No fair value published
The derivation ran and was refused by our own plausibility checks. We publish no number rather than a plausible-looking one.
Why · 2 checks
The derivation failed our plausibility check
The computed value landed outside the 0.4×–2.5× band that real price targets occupy. A result that far from the traded price means one of our inputs is wrong, not that the market is wrong by that much — so we publish nothing rather than clamp it into range.
A per-share input was repaired or refused
One of the per-share figures behind this valuation did not agree with the audited totals it should reconcile to, so it was recomputed from those totals or rejected outright.
What we would need
- A per-share input (earnings or book value) that reconciles to the latest audited totals.
- A per-share figure in the source data that reconciles to the reported totals.
Show what the engine computed
Rejected figure · ₦44.84 — ceiling — raw base ₦44.84 is 8.97x price. This figure is shown only to document what was refused; it is not an estimate and no upside is computed from it.
Method spread · 2.01× between the highest and lowest valuation leg.
Failed plausibility rail · Fair value hit our plausibility bounds: ceiling — raw base ₦44.84 is 8.97x price. The published base is the rail, not a derivation.
Figure corrected · EPS FY2025: eps_scale_disagreement(rep=1.2277 der=3.95)
Input quality · EPS FY2025: eps_scale_disagreement(rep=1.2277 der=3.95)
Independent cross-check · independent data source eps ₦0.8 is 0.2x our ₦3.95, which is read from FY2025 of the filed accounts and agrees with the previous year's printed comparative. our independent data snapshot carries no period and is not corroborated here; our figure stands.
Source: NGX live market data · Investo intelligence. Educational only — not financial advice.