AVAIF
Investo's verdict, shared with you
No fair value published
The derivation ran and was refused by our own plausibility checks. We publish no number rather than a plausible-looking one.
Why · 2 checks
Our valuation methods disagree
The earnings-based and book-based readings of this company differ by more than 2.5×. That spread is real information, but averaging it would manufacture a number no method actually produced.
A per-share input was repaired or refused
One of the per-share figures behind this valuation did not agree with the audited totals it should reconcile to, so it was recomputed from those totals or rejected outright.
What we would need
- Earnings and book value drawn from the same set of accounts, so the two legs can be reconciled.
- A per-share figure in the source data that reconciles to the reported totals.
Show what the engine computed
Method spread · 4.30× between the highest and lowest valuation leg.
Methods disagree · The valuation legs disagree by 4.3x (Blended P/E band ₦354443.42 vs Blended P/B band ₦1523761.84). No point estimate is defensible until the inputs are reconciled.
Figure corrected · BVPS FY2026: bvps_scale_disagreement(rep=1109 der=1109290.80)
Input quality · BVPS FY2026: bvps_scale_disagreement(rep=1109 der=1109290.80)
Source: NGX live market data · Investo intelligence. Educational only — not financial advice.